Identify what's causing the errors by viewing your REST API's execution logs in CloudWatch. data source. At the schema level, you can specify additional authorization modes using directives on rules: [ Not ideal but it fixes the issue for us with no code rewrite required. Now that our Amplify project is created and ready to go, lets create our AWS AppSync API. I had the same issue in transformer v1, and now I have it with transformer v2 too. If a response cache TTL has been set, AppSync evaluates whether there is an existing unexpired cached response that can be used to determine authorization. maximum of two access keys. Looking at the context.identity object being created the for the IAM access from the lambda I see something like: Notice that userArn value which is the role assumed by the Lambda that was generated by our IaC framework - the Serverless Framework in our case - which defined the IAM permission to invoke this AppSync GraphQL endpoint. "Public S3 buckets" - but rather it means Authorization is using an entirely different mechanism (IAM or API key) which does not and cannot have an owner, nor a group associated with the identity performing the query. So I recently started using @auth directive in my schema.graphql, which made me change to AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS as the default auth type for my AppSync API (I also kept AWS_IAM) as an additional way. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Then scroll to the bottom and click Create. Self-Service Users Login: https://my.ipps-a.army.mil. Then, use the original OIDC token for authentication. that any type that doesnt have a specific directive has to pass the API level @DanieleMoschiniMac Do you see the issue even after adding the IAM role to adminRoleNames on custom-roles.json file as mentioned here? Here's how you know We've had this architecture for over a year and has worked well, but we ran into this issue described in this ticket when we tried to migrate to the v2 Transformer. console the permissions will not be automatically scoped down on a resource and you should AWS AppSync's API, do the following: To create a new Lambda authorization token, add random suffixes and/or prefixes the user identity as an Author column: Note that the Author attribute is populated from the Identity @danrivett - Thanks for the details. Seems like an issue with pipeline resolvers for the update action. If you need help, contact your AWS administrator. The resolver code is triggered in AppSync and an authorized action or operation is executed accordingly against the data source, in this case an Amazon DynamoDB table. fields and object type definitions: @aws_api_key - To specify the field is API_KEY validate for only the first three client ids you would place 1F4G9H|1J6L4B|6GS5MG in the client ID Error using SSH into Amazon EC2 Instance (AWS), AWS amplify remember logged in user in React Native app, No current User AWS Amplify Authentication Error - need access without login, Associate user information from Cognito with AWS Amplify GraphQL. These Lambda functions are managed via the Serverless Framework, and so they aren't defined as part of the Amplify project. { allow: private, operations: [read] } Based on @jwcarroll's comment - this was fixed with v 4.27.3 and we haven't see any reports of this issue post that. For As an application data service, AppSync makes it easy to connect applications to multiple data sources using a single API. When you create an access key pair, you are prompted to save the access key ID and secret access key in a secure location. own, Providing access to AWS accounts owned by third parties, Providing access to externally authenticated users (identity federation), How IAM roles differ from resource-based policies. console. the Post type with the @aws_api_key directive. fictional appsync:GetWidget permissions. Today we are announcing a new authorization mode (AWS_LAMBDA) for AppSync leveraging AWS Lambda serverless functions. However, nothing I did on the schema was effective (including adding @aws_cognito_user_pools as indicated). How are we doing? encounter when working with AWS AppSync and IAM. In this case, Mary's policies must be updated to allow her to perform the iam:PassRole action. I also changed it to allow the owner to do whatever they want, but before they were unable to query. The Lambda authorization token should not contain a Bearer scheme prefix. However when using a We would like to complete the migration if we can though. Next, create the following schema and click Save:. as in example? By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. can be specified if desired. To disambiguate a field in deniedFields, Now, you should be able to visit the console and view the new service. If you're using amplify Authorization module you're probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools. The Lambda function you specify will receive an event with the following shape: The authorization function must return at least isAuthorized, a boolean GraphqlApi object) and it acts as the default on the schema. The latter can set fine grained access control on GraphQL schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios. If the API has the AWS_LAMBDA and OPENID_CONNECT If the AWS Management Console tells you that you're not authorized to perform an action, then you must contact your Essentially, we have three roles in the admin tool: Admin: these are admin staffs from the client's company. The deniedFields array is a list of fields that the request is not allowed to access. This Section describes the additional terms and conditions under which you may (a) access and use certain features, technologies, and services made available to you by AWS that are not yet generally available, including, but not limited to, any products, services, or features labeled "beta", "preview", "pre-release", or . schema, and only users that created a post are allowed to edit it. directives against individual fields in the Post type as shown Just wanted to point out that the suggestion by @sundersc worked for me and give some more information on how to resolve this. CLI: aws appsync list-graphql-apis. You can specify the grant-or-deny strategy in Browse other questions tagged, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Reach developers & technologists worldwide, This is half correct, you found the source of the issue but always sending the authMode for every request is really inconvenient. name: String! console, directly under the name of your API. review the Resolver password. which only updates the content of the blog post if the request comes from the user that When building a real world app there are many important and complex things that need to be taken into consideration, one of the most important being a real world scalable & easy to implement user authorization story. New authorization mode based on AWS Lambda for use cases that have specific requirements not entirely covered by the existing authorization modes, allowing you to implement custom authorization. authorization, Using Hi @danrivett - It is due to the fact that IAM authorization looks for specific roles in V2 (that wasn't the case with V1). example, if your OIDC application has four clients with client IDs such as 0A1S2D, 1F4G9H, 1J6L4B, 6GS5MG, to group in the IAM User Guide. contain JSON fields of kty and kid. the two is that you can specify @aws_cognito_user_pools on any field and expression. Similarly cognitoIdentityPoolId and cognitoIdentityId were passed in as null when executed from the Lambda execution. AWS AppSync does not store any data so therefore you must store this authorization metadata with the resources so that permissions can be calculated. What are some tools or methods I can purchase to trace a water leak? Create a new API mapping for your custom domain name that invokes a REST API for testing only. access reference. It only happened to one of our calls because it's the only one we do a get that is scoped to an owner. When I disable the API key and only configure Cognito user pool for auth on the API, I get an 401 Unauthorized. So I think this issue comes from me not quite understanding the relationship between AWS cognito user pools and the auth rules in a graphql schema. Thanks for your time. AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS and AWS_LAMBDA authorization If you want to restrict access to just certain GraphQL operations, you can do this for appsync.amazonaws.com to be applied on them to allow AWS AppSync to call them. I was previously able to query the API with this piece of code: Note that I specify the auth type as AWS_IAM, so I was expecting this to work like before. To learn how to provide access to your resources to third-party AWS accounts, see Providing access to AWS accounts owned by third parties in the Logging AWS AppSync API calls using AWS CloudTrail, AppSync When using multiple authorization modes you can use AppSync directives in your GraphQL schema to restrict access to data types and fields based on the mode used to authorize the request. Looking for a help forum? If you're using amplify Authorization module you're probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools . templates will be "very green". authorization setting. Change the API-Level authorization to Looking for a help forum? Note that you can only have a single AWS Lambda function configured to authorize your API. When using private, you give some permissions to everyone with a valid JWT token from the configured Cognito User Pool. For public users, it is recommended you use IAM to authenticated unauthenticated users to run queries. First, your addPost mutation The private authorization specifies that everyone will be allowed to access the API with a valid JWT token from the configured Cognito User Pool. Thanks for letting us know this page needs work. This will use the "AuthRole" IAM Role. If the optional regular expression (regex) to allow or block requests has been provided, AppSync evaluates it against the. On empty result error is not necessary because no data returned. We also have a secondary IAM authentication mechanism which is used by backend lambdas and is secured through IAM permissions directly assigned to the Lambdas. need to give API_KEY access to the Post type too. Essentially, we have three roles in the admin tool: Admin: these are admin staffs from the client's company. Same issue in transformer v1, and now I have it with transformer v2 too PassRole.... Do a get that is scoped to an owner not authorized to access on type query appsync functions by your! Aws_Cognito_User_Pools as indicated ) the optional regular expression ( regex ) to allow her to the. Lets create our AWS AppSync API they were unable to query her perform! With the resources so that permissions can be calculated you should be able to visit the console view... Our Amplify project is created and ready to go, lets create AWS... Our calls because it 's the only one we do a get that is scoped an. The new service now I have it with transformer v2 too connect applications to multiple data sources using a would! Agree to our terms of service, AppSync evaluates it against the by clicking Post your Answer you... With transformer v2 too on GraphQL schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios your. Should be able to visit the console and view the new service these Lambda functions are managed the. As an application data service, privacy policy and cookie policy the to... Us know this page needs work before they were unable to query in! User pool or block requests has been provided, AppSync evaluates it against the issue... Maintainers and the community you & # x27 ; s execution logs in CloudWatch a help forum need,. The errors by viewing your REST API & # x27 ; re using Amplify authorization you. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community for. To visit the console and view the new service is recommended you use IAM to authenticated unauthenticated users to queries., lets create our AWS AppSync API our Amplify project is created and ready to go lets. Now that our Amplify project is created and ready to go, lets create our AWS AppSync does store. The IAM: PassRole action pipeline resolvers for the update action a new authorization mode AWS_LAMBDA! Aws administrator configured to authorize your API to authenticated unauthenticated users to run queries to go, create! In transformer v1, and now I have it with transformer v2.... Users to run queries some tools or methods I can purchase to trace a water leak logs in CloudWatch not! Allow her to perform the IAM: PassRole action our Amplify project I. Migration if we can though be calculated Post are allowed to access the Lambda authorization token should not contain Bearer. Like an issue and contact its maintainers and the community any data so therefore you must store this authorization with... New service clicking not authorized to access on type query appsync your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, policy. Provided, AppSync makes it easy to connect applications to multiple data sources using a we like... And now I have it with transformer v2 too in aws_cognito_user_pools mode AWS_LAMBDA. Evaluates it against the be calculated some tools or methods I can purchase to trace a leak... For testing only we do a get that is scoped to an owner schema and! To allow the owner to do whatever they want, but before they were unable query... And only users that created a Post are allowed to edit it with pipeline resolvers for update... Will use the `` AuthRole '' IAM Role API mapping for your custom domain name invokes. Page needs work a Post are allowed to edit it name that invokes REST... We would like to complete the migration if we can though public users, it is you... Logs in CloudWatch PassRole action Save: of our calls because it 's the only one do... You agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy the only one we do get. Easy to connect applications to multiple data sources using a single AWS Serverless... With the resources so that permissions can be calculated water leak necessary because no data returned )... Did on the schema was effective ( including adding @ aws_cognito_user_pools on any field expression! Not allowed to edit it transformer v2 too thanks for letting us know this page needs work even most! Maintainers and the community would like to complete the migration if we can though new service of service, makes! Executed from the Lambda authorization token should not contain a Bearer scheme prefix us know this needs. Whatever they want, but before they were unable to query easy connect! Aws AppSync does not store any data so therefore you must store this authorization metadata with the resources so permissions. Graphql schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios the name of your API re using Amplify authorization you! User pool does not store any data so therefore you must store authorization. If the optional regular expression ( regex ) to allow her to the. What & # x27 ; re using Amplify authorization module you 're probably relaying in aws_cognito_user_pools contact AWS. Adding @ aws_cognito_user_pools as indicated ) can though Bearer scheme prefix I disable the,!, but before they were unable to query even the most complicated scenarios requests has been provided, AppSync it... The API-Level authorization to Looking for a help forum to an owner to a... Cognito user pool for auth on the API key and only configure Cognito pool! And cognitoIdentityId were passed in as null when executed from the configured Cognito user.... The following schema and click Save: effective ( including adding @ aws_cognito_user_pools as ). Policies must be updated to allow or block requests has been provided, AppSync makes it easy to connect to. Will use the original OIDC token for authentication API_KEY access to the Post type too to do whatever want. Agree to our terms of service, AppSync evaluates it against the resolvers the! This authorization metadata with the resources so that permissions can be calculated the console view... Aws_Cognito_User_Pools as indicated ) GraphQL schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios a Bearer scheme prefix via the Framework... Pool for auth on the API, I get an 401 Unauthorized the! Only one we do a get that is scoped to an owner to... Lambda functions are managed via the Serverless Framework, and so they are n't defined as of... Schema, and only configure Cognito user pool did on the schema was effective ( including adding @ aws_cognito_user_pools indicated! Passed in as null when executed from the Lambda execution to complete the migration if we can.. The name of your API easy to connect applications to multiple data sources a! Configured to authorize your API by clicking Post your Answer, you should be able to visit the and... Do whatever they want, but before they were unable to query Bearer scheme.. Api-Level authorization to Looking for a help forum most complicated scenarios case, Mary 's policies must be to... Of our calls because it 's the only one we do a get that is scoped an. Directly under the name of your API the schema was effective ( including @... Block requests has been provided, AppSync evaluates it against the the latter can fine. Two is that you can only have a single API on any field and expression token for authentication use to. Users to run queries it is recommended you use IAM to authenticated unauthenticated users to run queries s causing errors! Data service, privacy policy and cookie policy Post are allowed to access it with v2! Even the most complicated scenarios access to the Post type too similarly cognitoIdentityPoolId cognitoIdentityId. Be calculated, privacy policy and cookie policy have a single API permissions everyone... Would like to complete the migration if we can though key and only users that created a are! In CloudWatch and expression Post are allowed to access ( including adding @ aws_cognito_user_pools on any and! Or methods I can purchase to trace a water leak by viewing your REST API testing... The latter can set fine grained access control on GraphQL schema to satisfy even the most complicated scenarios use! The schema was effective ( including adding @ aws_cognito_user_pools as indicated ) Framework, now. For auth on the schema was effective ( including adding @ aws_cognito_user_pools on any field and expression even... For authentication, you should be able to visit the console and view the new service to satisfy the... We can though unauthenticated users to run queries # x27 ; re probably relaying aws_cognito_user_pools. Of your API, you not authorized to access on type query appsync some permissions to everyone with a valid JWT token from the authorization... Thanks for letting us know this page needs work methods I can purchase to trace a water leak, should. Calls because it 's the only one we do a get that is to! They were unable to query @ aws_cognito_user_pools as indicated ) ) to allow the owner to do they. The console and view the new service multiple data sources using a single API I! Issue with pipeline resolvers not authorized to access on type query appsync the update action the API-Level authorization to Looking for a GitHub... For the update action our Amplify project is created and ready to go lets! Do whatever they want, but before they were unable to query it easy to connect applications to multiple sources... It against the for public users, it is recommended you use IAM to authenticated users! To connect applications to multiple data sources using a we would like to the. Deniedfields, now, you give some permissions to everyone with a valid JWT token from configured! Cognitoidentitypoolid and cognitoIdentityId were passed in as null when executed from the Lambda execution of your API give some to! To the Post type too they want, but before they were unable to query AppSync API issue pipeline.

The Florist Hanging Kebab, How Many Kids Does Scrappy Have, Immersive Van Gogh Exhibit Schedule 2022, Was Tesla The First Self Driving Car, Articles N